In the school setting, children
learn so much and cover many types of material but I believe they should only
be assessed on what they have actually been taught. The big stress of many administrators,
teachers, and their students is the PARCC assessment, as many states in the
United States administer this assessment to their elementary school children. While
I may teach kindergarten, I still sit through meetings about PARCC and how we
can begin to prepare even our kindergarteners to be successful when they get to
third grade. How is this appropriate? How is this the best path to take in
educating our young learners? Why are we only concerned about how well a child
does on an assessment?
Testing a
child on their reading and math skills are important but so are their emotional
and social skills. Can a child effectively express their emotions? Can a child
interact with their peers and adults in an appropriate way? These are things
that I think get pushed aside when children get to school and the focus shifts
solely to their learning. I think it is important to remember that we are
working with a child, a whole child, not just the academic part of their brain.
In the
Netherlands, children are enrolled in primary school from age five to twelve.
At age twelve, students take a national exam which then determines what path of
secondary school they will take. There are three paths of secondary school;
general, academic, and vocational. Although placed in a certain path, students
are able to change paths if they would like. While it sounds nice that students are given the choice to change their path, I wonder how these placements may effect children's emotional health.
Resource:
http://ncee.org/what-we-do/center-on-international-education-benchmarking/top-performing-countries/netherlands-overview/netherlands-instructional-systems/